Ban on Candidate Contribution Sticks
It is imperative to mention that the courts have chosen to stick to the ban imposed on contribution of unlimited funds to political campaigns. You will realize that around 90% of Americans prefer having the role of money in politics to be put under control. This is what has made so many people to eagerly wait for the ruling so as to know what role the corporates will take in financing politics in future. The decision by the Supreme Court will certainly not be welcome for all. They refused to lift the ban on this political campaign finance law. You will get to understand more about this particular ruling as you keep on reading.
You need to understand that nothing really happened in court. Even without taking into account the challenges in the prevailing campaign finance laws, the Supreme Court chose to go with it. As such, no corporate will be free to donate their money to campaigns or even candidates. It is through this decision that the role of corporates in the political arena is being tamed. In the previous ruling, you will learn that corporates were often allowed to contribute to the campaigns. This would have been allowed in case the money was not directly associated to particular individuals. You will learn that this case was brought to court by two companies from Massachusetts. The aim of this case was to make sure that a boost in financial responsibility and even economic opportunities is enriched. It will actually be valuable for you to go for the services of a top lawyer in the event that you want to present such a big case.
Seek to ensure that you are familiarized with the legal argument in this case. It is imperative to mention that these companies indicated that the first amendment rights of companies was not being considered. They argued that freedom of speech will time and again be compromised by these political donations. They also invoked the constitution which seeks to protect every individual equally. You will find that non-profit as well as charity organizations are barely given the room to donate to these political campaigns. This in itself shows that corporate entities are receiving preferential treatment. This is seen to be against the pillars of the constitution.
It is imperative to mention that what the high court ruled was still favored. This ruling claimed that corporates are not allowed to donate money to political campaigns. This is brought about by the ease of causing corruption in politics. This means that all political candidates will be forbidden from accepting such donations from various corporations.